Geoff Miller

Archive for the ‘Case Studies using TAIS’ Category

Case Study: Stressed Out Athletes

In Case Studies using TAIS on January 30, 2010 at 7:07 pm

I’ve posted a case study at www.sandiegosportspsychology.com and I wanted to share it with my baseball readers.  This case study is about a Division I College football player, but the profile and my summary would be similar regardless of the sport this athlete played.  The combination of level of stress and introverted, quiet personality style made this case interesting to me and I’ve written it up to call attention to the “quiet athlete”.  Quiet athletes won’t just volunteer information on how they are doing, especially when they are worried or stressed.  And talking about their worries can be more worrisome than the worries themselves, which is why stress levels can build quickly when these athletes feel pressure.  Here’s a link to the case study:

Click Here to read about this stressed out athlete.

If you would like to receive new posts from The Winning Mind in Baseball by email, please CLICK HERE.

For more information on using TAIS with your players, please contact Geoff Miller at miller@thewinningmind.com.

Case Study: Paralysis by Analysis

In Case Studies using TAIS on January 13, 2010 at 1:45 pm

From time to time, I will be posting case studies that include sample data from our TAIS inventory.  TAIS stands for The Attentional and Interpersonal Style inventory and we use it with all of our coaching clients in corporate, sport, and military settings.  In my work with professional baseball players and teams, I use TAIS to help players in the majors and minors identify their mental game strengths and weaknesses, then use TAIS data to help them shape performance improvement plans.  On the scouting side, I use TAIS to evaluate potential draft picks, which are not used in a “thumbs up, thumbs down” fashion, but more to help provide another level of detail on who the player is on and off the field, how he will handle failure and pressure, and the best ways to help each player develop skills and learn the game.

This case study is on a pitcher who thinks too much when he gets into jams and makes things more complicated for himself.  I’m including only a sampling of TAIS scales (there are twenty factors that are measured when someone takes TAIS and a brief description on each so you can understand the context of the case.  Learning a bit about this player may help you if you have players like the one I’m profiling here.

Case Study:  C
Position:  Right-Handed Pitcher
Biggest Derailer:  Paralysis by Analysis
Comparison Group: World Champions

Favorite Channel

The first factors I look at when reviewing a TAIS profile are the attentional factors.  I want to know what the player’s “favorite channel” is so I can know how he will pay attention under pressure.  Player C’s favorite channel between Awareness, Analysis, and Narrow Focus (which we call Action) is Analysis.  This tells me that Player C is someone who figures things out.  He is most comfortable when he is out-thinking his opponents and probably does a great job game-planning before a start, knowing exactly how is going to set up and finish off each hitter in the line up.  He is above average at staying focused and blocking out distractions and he has an average feel for the game and gut instinct.  But when he feels pressure, his thought process gets going and he has trouble sticking to a simple plan.  In the big picture, this pitcher should be very successful, but in the moment, he will find himself thinking too much instead of just going after hitters.

Confidence and Self-Criticism

The next score that really jumps out at me is Player C’s confidence score.  He has rated himself as more confident than 99% of other World Class athletes, but unlike the typical over-confident athlete, he hasn’t exaggerated his abilities and his other scores aren’t all that extreme.  As another indicator that Player C is confident and well-adjusted, I notice that his Self-Criticism score is 7%.  That’s a very low score and it tells me that Player C is resilient and doesn’t let negative performance get to him very often.  But the score is high enough to tell me that he is thinking about ways that he can improve as a pitcher.  He is willing to evaluate his performance.  I like this profile as a case study because it shows how connections can be made using TAIS scores to understand players from a number of different perspectives.  Player C’s confidence and self-criticism tell me that evaluation is important to him, which is another place that his analytical nature creeps in.  Which brings me to learning style…

Learning Style

Continuing on our theme of an athlete who engages in too much thinking, we see that Player C’s Information Processing score is 85%, which is higher than most top draft picks.  This player wants to multitask, he likes to have a lot of information and enjoys having a lot going on in his world.  He gets bored easily and will need to have some variety in his routines and practice plans.

For Decision Making Style, Player C scores 3%.  Remember that Decision Making Style tells how quickly a person commits to a decision, with low scores being quick to commit and high scores needing more time to come to a decision.  Player C makes up his mind quickly and doesn’t second-guess his decisions.  He picks up on things faster than others might and he doesn’t worry about the details.  This is a fast learning, information-seeking player who can be challenged intellectually, but needs to learn some patience and pay better attention to detail.

Summary

Player C’s profile looks like that of the classic smart athlete.  While most elite athletes pay attention in a narrow-focused style under pressure, Player C prefers to think himself out of a jam.  This style is a mismatch in athletic settings and while it’s not alarming in a “flagging” kind of way, it is still much more rare that athletes with analytical styles will maximize their physical talents because of the “paralysis by analysis” effect.  This player’s strengths are big-picture thinking, a strong learning capacity, and the ability to take information and quickly translate it into on-field behaviors. He is confident, social, eloquent, optimistic, and has just enough constructive criticism of himself to push himself to be great.  He’s focused, has a strong work ethic, and average awareness of himself.  Player C’s biggest challenges will be quieting his mind and being patient enough to see some results of his hard work before starting over and figuring out a new plan. He’s so quick to make up his mind that he needs a fast-paced, constantly challenging environment.  He may overcomplicate his life and his pitching just so he has more things to figure out and keep multi-tasked.  And he might speed up the game just to match his processing speed only to find that he can’t slow it down again.

If you would like to receive new posts from The Winning Mind in Baseball by email, please CLICK HERE.

For more information on using TAIS with your players, please contact Geoff Miller at miller@thewinningmind.com.

Case Study: Over-Confidence

In Case Studies using TAIS on January 3, 2010 at 9:15 am

From time to time, I will be posting case studies that include sample data from our TAIS inventory.  TAIS stands for The Attentional and Interpersonal Style inventory and we use it with all of our coaching clients in corporate, sport, and military settings.  In my work with professional baseball players and teams, I use TAIS to help players in the majors and minors identify their mental game strengths and weaknesses, then use TAIS data to help them shape performance improvement plans.  On the scouting side, I use TAIS to evaluate potential draft picks, which are not used in a “thumbs up, thumbs down” fashion, but more to help provide another level of detail on who the player is on and off the field, how he will handle failure and pressure, and the best ways to help each player develop skills and learn the game.

This case study is on a hitter who is smart and capable, but masking insecurity with extreme overconfidence.  I’m including only a sampling of TAIS scales (there are twenty factors that are measured when someone takes TAIS and a brief description on each so you can understand the context of the case.  Learning a bit about this player may help you if you have players like the one I’m profiling here.

For more information on TAIS, please visit www.taisinventory.com.

Case Study:  B

Position:  Infield/Outfield

Biggest Derailer:  Over-Confidence

Comparison Group: World Champions

Favorite Channel

The first factors I look at when reviewing a TAIS profile are the attentional factors.  I want to know what the player’s “favorite channel” is so I can know how he will pay attention under pressure.  Player B’s favorite channel between Awareness, Analysis, and Narrow Focus (which we call Action) is Analysis, although his scores on these three scales are all high and relatively balanced.  This tells me that Player B is confident in his strategic thinking, but that he is also very confident in having good feel for the game and in staying focused when he needs to block out his thoughts.  However, when he feels pressure, his first instinct is going to be to over-think the situation and it will be difficult to keep it simple.

Confidence and Self-Criticism

These scores are the real key to Player B’s profile and they help me understand how he rates himself on every other scale.  Player B has rated himself more confident than 99% of other World Class athletes and is less critical of himself than 99% of those athletes as well.  Player B is telling me that he is as confident as can be and that he doesn’t see any room for improvement in his game.  As I see this pattern of scores, I know that dealing with failure is going to be an issue for this player and that he will likely have a list of reasons why others are to blame for his failure instead of reflecting on his own shortcomings.

Learning Style

Next, I’m going to look at a combination of scores to get an understanding of the best way for this player to learn. Player B scores 96% on Information Processing, so he loves to multitask.  He wants as much information as he can get on as many channels as possible.  He gets bored easily and will need some diversity in his routines and practice plans.  The same thing every day will get old for Player B.

For Decision Making Style, Player B scores 3%.  Remember that Decision Making Style tells how quickly a person commits to a decision, with low scores being quick to commit and high scores needing more time to come to a decision.  Player B makes up his mind quickly and doesn’t second-guess his decisions.  He picks up on things faster than others might and he doesn’t worry about the details.  This is a fast learning, information-seeking player who can be challenged intellectually, but needs to learn some patience and pay better attention to detail.

Expression of Ideas

I look at expression scores in the same way I look at Attention Scores, seeking out the player’s highest score between three categories to understand how each player communicates best.  By “communicate” I mean how he will speak with me and also how he would prefer to be spoken to, as well.  The three communication styles that each person uses are Expression of Ideas, Expression of Criticism and Anger, and Expression of Support and Affection.  Player B scores a whopping 90% on Expression of Ideas, which tells me that he is someone who has a lot to say and isn’t going to be shy about saying it.  His communication style matches his favorite channel and his learning style, and this player prides himself on his abilities to express ideas.  If you ask a simple question like “How are you today?” you can expect to get a long, complicated answer with lots of information.  This player isn’t going to just answer “fine” and be on his way.

Summary

Player B’s profile can be summed up by his confidence.  He believes he is as good or better than anyone else on physical and intellectual levels.  He turns his greatest strength into his greatest weakness often.  He overuses his confidence and refuses to take accountability for mistakes.  The most effective way to get Player B to make improvements to his game will be to find a way to get him to come up with his own ideas for change.  But telling him where he went wrong will only get resistance and lots of answers from him on how your assessment is faulty.  If he spent as much energy working on improving himself as he does in resistance, he’d be as good as he thinks he is.

If you would like to receive new posts from The Winning Mind in Baseball by email, please CLICK HERE.

For more information on using TAIS with your players, please contact Geoff Miller at miller@thewinningmind.com.

Case Study: Perfectionist

In Case Studies using TAIS on December 7, 2009 at 11:34 pm

From time to time, I will be posting case studies that include sample data from our TAIS inventory.  TAIS stands for The Attentional and Interpersonal Style inventory and we use it with all of our coaching clients in corporate, sport, and military settings.  In my work with professional baseball players and teams, I use TAIS to help players in the majors and minors identify their mental game strengths and weaknesses, then use TAIS data to help them shape performance improvement plans.  On the scouting side, I use TAIS to evaluate potential draft picks, which are not used in a “thumbs up, thumbs down” fashion, but more to help provide another level of detail on who the player is on and off the field, how he will handle failure and pressure, and the best ways to help each player develop skills and learn the game.  This case study is on an infielder who is too mechanical with his actions, is overly perfectionistic in his self-evaluation, and carries too much stress with him while playing the game.  I’m including only a sampling of TAIS scales (there are twenty factors that are measured when someone takes TAIS and a brief description on each so you can understand the context of the case.  Learning a bit about this player may help you if you have players like the one I’m profiling here.

For more information on TAIS, please visit www.taisinventory.com.

Case Study:  A

Position:  Infield

Biggest Derailer:  Perfectionism

Comparison Group: World Champions

Favorite Channel

The first factors I look at when reviewing a TAIS profile are the attentional factors.  I want to know what the player’s “favorite channel” is so I can know how he will pay attention under pressure.  Player A’s favorite channel between Awareness, Analysis, and Narrow Focus (which we call Action) is Narrow Focus, dominating the other two factors in comparison.  This tells me that Player A is detail-oriented and works on the little things when he feels pressure. The 31% on Awareness in contrast tells me that he doesn’t use his instincts enough when he’s playing and relies more on repetition and refining his skills than trusting his ability.

Learning Style

Next, I’m going to look at a combination of scores to get an understanding of the best way for this player to learn.  He doesn’t like to multitask and wants information in small bits, rather than trying to take on a lot at once.  I can tell this from his lower information processing score.  This doesn’t tell me whether a person is smart or not, it tells me how that person approaches a new problem. I’m also going to consider his analysis score and his decision-making style to see how quickly he makes up his mind and how much he enjoys thinking in big picture terms. Both scores confirm the “one thing at a time” approach, so I know that Player A prefers to master skills in a slow, methodical fashion.

Competitiveness

Our measure of physical competitiveness tells us how much a player is willing to sacrifice his body to win.  In simple terms, this is our measure of “no pain, no gain.”  Player A is willing to do whatever it takes to be a winner.

Decision Making Style

This is the signature sign of a perfectionist.  Decision Making Style tells me how quickly a person commits to a decision.  You can think of the score as the amount of time it takes to make up your mind.  So a low score means you are a fast decision-maker and a high score means you are a slow one.  The higher the score, the more a person will second-guess him or herself and/or continue thinking about whether they made the right decision.  The extremes on this factor point out well that there are no “good” scores on TAIS, only preferences that carry strengths and consequences to them depending on when they are used.  Low scorers on decision-making style are more interested in speed than accuracy.  High scorers want to know that they made the right decision, even if it takes a little longer…which is why strong perfectionists typically have high scores on this factor.  Player A scores 85% on Decision Making Style, which is still in the normal range for a world class athlete, but most world class athletes are too perfectionistic.

Summary

Player A has a classic grinding, hard-nosed style that includes a bit too much perfectionism.  He is extremely focused and detail-oriented, needing to develop more feel for the game and trust his gut more instead of playing by numbers.  He would benefit from setting goals that are based on process rather than outcome and he will need help letting go of mistakes and staying positive.  His best performances will come when he gets comfortable in his environment and starts giving himself a break.

If you would like to receive new posts from The Winning Mind in Baseball by email, please CLICK HERE.

For more information on using TAIS with your players, please contact Geoff Miller at miller@thewinningmind.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.